A prediction market is only as trustworthy as the layer that resolves it. When two sides disagree on an outcome, Kleros settles it through a neutral, transparent due process that scales alongside the platform.
five years of contested outcomes, settled by jury.
Any voting oracle rewards voters for converging on the answer the panel is expected to choose, a Schelling point. The difference is who sits on the panel.
Many contested outcomes trace to the market's own rules or a late clarification, not the oracle. A vague question produces an ugly dispute under any mechanism. But some questions are genuinely subjective, and at some point a human has to rule.
The real question was never whether humans decide the hard cases. It is which humans, chosen how, and accountable to what.
25% of stake is a 25% chance of being drawn as a juror, not 25% of the verdict.
And every appeal raises the cost of holding a dishonest result, making concentration expensive rather than decisive.







Plug Reality.eth and Kleros into your market in a few steps. Optimistic by default, with a credible court behind the hard cases. Keep your fast path, whether a team, a bot or an AI resolver, and add a jury only for contested outcomes.